Construction Grammar and Corpus-based constructional analysis

The kit has two core modules: One module offers a basic introduction into Construction Grammar. The second module introduces the method of corpus-based constructional analysis.

The two modules should be combined with an ice breaker module. It is designed for an en-bloc collaboration scenario, but other designs are possible, as well.

Topic(s):
Construction Grammar Constructional analysis Corpus-based analysis Cross-linguistic analysis Data annotation Research methods

Subject Area(s):
Linguistics

Level(s):
Early M.A. Late B.A.

Type:
Comprehensive Unit

Author(s):

Instructional time:
4 weeks, 0,5 ECTS (12-15 hours, 4x90 min instruction)

Course Kit information


Underpinning methodologies:
Corpus linguistics
Creating (complex) corpus queries
Annotation and analysis of linguistic data
Didactic methodologies

Resources required:
Background literature on the theoretical framework of Construction Grammar (if not yet addressed earlier in the programme)

Technology needed:
Computer for each participant
Access to SketchEngine or NoSketchEngine
Spreadsheet programme
Platform for online collaboration (Zoom, Teams, ...)

People needed:
Besides the lecturers of the involved courses, it is useful to have back-up of a research assistant to facilitate the online collaboration (creating student lists, working groups, etc.)

Assessment:
Oral group presentation and discussion

Evaluation:
Evaluation and Baseline evaluation as Moodle Test Oral group presentation of the results of the constructional analysis and discussion

Skills:

CxG:

  • Find.Research 4: I research a limited topic in at least two languages using digital tools.
  • Plan.Research 4: I can identify my information needs and, with guidance, access secondary and selected primary sources with support using an appropriate research strategy

Method (BA):

  • Plan.Method 4: I know a limited number of qualitative and quantitative methods. I can apply some methods independently.
  • Plan.Design 4: I understand that the implementation has to follow the design and the two are in correlation.
  • Implement.Data 4: I collect empirical data consistently with digital tools. I know how to work around bias and observer paradox and do so with guidance.
  • Implement.Analyse 4: I independently analyse my own simple data of selected data types according to given patterns, observing the research design.
  • Implement.Synthesise 4: I draw conclusions from my analysis within the framework of the given theory under guidance.
  • Share.Discuss 4: I can explain simple facts correctly in terms of terminology and with further knowledge and defend my point of view.

Method (MA):

  • Plan.Method 4: I know a limited number of qualitative and quantitative methods. I can apply some methods independently.
  • Plan.Design 5: I strictly follow my design in implementation and understand that implementation can be a cycle (MA)
  • Implement.Data 4: I collect empirical data consistently with digital tools. I know how to work around bias and observer paradox and do so with guidance.
  • Implement.Analyse 4: I independently analyse my own simple data of selected data types according to given patterns, observing the research design.
  • Implement.Synthesise 5: I independently draw conclusions from my analysis within the framework of a [self-selected??] theory.
  • Share.Discuss 5: I can explain complex issues, explain and defend my point of view on them and reflect on the theoretical premises of my argumentation.

Activities:

CxG: Only passive input (-> knowledge)

Method: Passive input (-> knowledge), guided self-paced corpus analysis, Q&A session in week 3 (-> skill)

Course: Passive input on presentation and discussion (-> knowledge), practise and feedback (-> skill)

Focus:
Array

Attributes:
Prerequisites or acquired during course

Linked resources:
Array